we win blu(1).gif

10. THE LAST EXAM BEFORE THE PUBLICATION (the confirmation)

The time for the last exam to evaluate the heavy metals intoxication, before the publication, was coming. In the same circumstance I got four urine examinations, which I describe:

  1. PRE: this urine examination was made in order to evaluate only the Aluminium level, before getting the infusion. It’s processed in Bologna.
  2. POST: this urine examination was made in order to evaluate only the Aluminium level, immediately after getting the infusion. It’s processed in Bologna.
  3. USA: this examination measures 19 heavy metals in the three hours which follows the infusion, as shown in the paragraph “8.2. Aluminium level in my body”. It’s processed at the Genova Lab. in USA.
  4. POST PER USA: after collecting the urine in the big can for three hours, we didn’t extract two samples but rather three. The first two samples were sent to USA in order to evaluate 19 heavy metals; instead the third one was sent to the laboratory in Bologna in order to have a cross check of the Aluminium level between these two laboratory.

Basically three examinations were processed in Bologna and one examination in USA.
These examinations were made in order to:

  • Confirm the unreliability of the examination made before getting the infusion.
  • Confirm these two examination methodologies, that is comparing “the first throw” of the urine after the infusion respect with the sample after three hours the infusion.
  • Evaluate the difference between the value measured in Bologna with the one which is measured in USA coming from the same source, that is the common can.
  • Evaluate the Gadolinium level.

Now I’d like to analyzed the results.
NB:
before evaluating the Aluminium value of the exam made in USA it’s necessary to uniform the unit of measurement with the Italian values.

Sample results processed in Bologna:
PRE: 2,28 mcg/l
POST EDTA: 88,67 mcg/l
POST PER USA: 41,41 mcg/l

Sample results processed in USA:
Creatinine 16.18 (milligrams/deciliter, that is mg/dl)
Aluminium 212,8 mcg/g_creatinine < 22.3 mcg/g_creatinine
Gadolinium 7,695 mcg/g_creatinine < 0.019 mcg/g_creatinine

(click on this image to enlarge it)

(click on this image to enlarge it)

Foto esame America.

Now I’d like to analyze the results:

  • The examination made before the infusion is not meaningful at all, because the heavy metals tie with the body tissues and they can’t be expelled in a spontaneous way.
  • As predictable, the examination result of the “first throw” is bigger then the examination which “collects the urine for three hours”. In fact the second examination is a medium value of the three hours, while the first one is the “instant peak” value. Therefore the all method, which we adopt to check my intoxication, is consistent, because we’ve always considered the worst-case.
  • Instead now I’d like to analyze the third point, that is verifying the difference between two samples coming from the same source, but processed the first one in Bologna, the second one in USA.I’d like to express the American value with the same unit of measurement of the examination made in Bologna, as already shown in “8.2. Aluminium level in my body”.Aluminium = 212.8 (microgram/gram of creatinine, that is mcg/gcreat)
    Creatinine = 16.18 (milligram/dl)
    Therefore:
    Aluminium (mcg/l) = Aluminium [USA, that is (mcg/gcreat)] * 16.18 (g/l) * (10/1000)
    That is:
    Aluminium (mcg/l) = 212.8 [USA, that is (mcg/gcreat)] * 0.1618 (g/l) = 34.43 (mcg/l)

    The results of these two samples are:

    • POST PER USA = 41,41 mcg/l;
    • USA = 34,43 mcg/l.

    As you can easily notice the values are nearly the same, the little difference is due to the fact that these two samples are from different test-tubes, even if they are from the same source.

  • Finally I’d like to analyze the last point, that is to verify the Gadolinium value, respect to the value which was measured previously.
    • Gadolinium 06/24/2008 = 61.604 mcg/gcreat;
    • Gadolinium 01/20/2009 = 7,695 mcg/gcreat.

    As you can notice the new value is decreased about 10 times, that is an order of magnitude.

    This is a confirmation to the fact that the EDTA is able to tie with all the heavy metals and only the Aluminium, as I’ve already explained in “4.1 EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid)”.
    Moreover I’d like to add that just got the magnetic resonance with chelating agents the value trend of 5 consecutive Aluminium examinations were nearly the same, due to the fact that the EDTA mainly tied with Gadolinium. If you remember I had a complete sensibility lack of my left foot just after the resonance, totally recovered after 2 EDTA infusions.

My heavy metal intoxication level is still too high (even if I’m really fine, February 2009), for example the Aluminium is 88,67 mcg/l, four times the maximum threshold and Gadolinium is still at 7,695 mcg/gcreat, about 400 times the maximum threshold, even if it’s decreased a lot respect to the previously result. Therefore for this reason I’ll go on with my detoxification and I’ll keep you informed about new development.

  • The last examinations of the urine before the publication have confirmed that:
  1. The examination made before the infusion is not meaningful at all, because the heavy metals tie with the body tissues and they can’t be expelled in a spontaneous way.
  2. As predictable, the examination result of the “first throw” is bigger then the examination which “collects the urine for three hours”. In fact the second examination is a medium value of the three hours, while the first one is the “instant peak” value. Therefore the all method, which we adopt to check my intoxication, is consistent, because we’ve always considered the worst-case.
  3. The measure, which was processed in Bologna, is nearly equal with the American one, the same source, but different samples.
  4. The new value of Gadolinium is decreased about 10 times, that is an order of magnitude. This is a confirmation to the fact that the EDTA is able to tie with all the heavy metals and only the Aluminium.